Toyota Oil Consumption Lawsuit Nuits Comes Into Focus
Toyota Oil Consumption lawsuit will be filed by the plaintiffs on behalf of themselves and other plaintiffs in their case. The lawyers are filing the lawsuit against Toyota because they feel that they have been the victims of intentional deception and violation of their legal rights as well as breach of contract.
The victims of this intentional deception are the oil company i.e. Shell Petroleum and its president, who are John D. Rockefeller, I am certain that you are already familiar with the name Shell.
Toyota Oil Consumption Lawsuit
John D. Rockefeller was the one who was the one responsible for the discovery of so many oil discoveries. He established a corporation to explore these newly discovered oil reserves. During the early years of his corporation, John D. Rockefeller developed a plan to develop the largest oil reserve in the world and hence he called it “the Grand Standard”. But when it came to deciding the boundaries of their oil exploration territory, John D. Rockefeller realized that there should be no such boundaries in his territory.
This is the reason why in April of 2021, the then CEO of Shell Corporation, Mr. Alex Deese issued a public apology stating that Shell regrets having carried out such an aggressive and unnecessary advertisement about oil consumption which could have mislead consumers to believe that the engine of a car can double as a hydrogen fuel cell and thus double its mileage.
In his statement, Shell said that the technical service bulletin is not intended to be a technical support article relating to the content of the advertisements but it was meant to provide a guideline to the suppliers and manufacturers of the Shell brands for ensuring proper product handling of the oil consumption.
It is expected from all manufacturers that if any customer representative requires information on the maintenance of their vehicle they should be given the details without being asked to disclose their identity. It is a grave issue that this disclosure may lead to fraudulent acts of some kind. For this reason, the Shell Group has taken steps to institute a program for educating manufacturers and suppliers on proper product handling and proper product maintenance.
As of this writing, the only person to be reprimanded for this inappropriate advertisement is Mr. John D. Rockefeller, the current CEO of Shell.
Mr. Rockefeller has since been replaced by a highly respected executive named Robert M. S Barber, III. Mr. Barber is a former VP of engineering at both Shell Oil Co. and also holds the position of President of the board of directors for GE Consumers, one of the largest consumer goods companies in the world. Mr. Barber is responsible for instituting a new policy for the company regarding the running of its engine, which is now expected to double fuel economy, or to reach fuel economy standards of the mid-2021’s.
This means that Shell will be able to save two hundred thousand barrels per day, or about five million barrels per year, according to court documents filed by plaintiffs in a California federal court lawsuit against the defendant.
According to plaintiffs, the company’s new engine oil requirement for the 7 series, models introduced in 2021, will require an engine that meets the new mandatory emissions standards for cars.
The new requirements, the plaintiffs claim, are based on studies conducted by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). The studies indicate that the oil consumption of the current seven series cars will cause extreme problems if they are to be used every day in a city environment.
For example, the cars currently available on the market will require about eleven thousand gallons of engine oil every single drive. If those cars were to be used every day in a metropolitan area, such as Los Angeles, it would result in an astounding one hundred and twenty-three barrels of oil consumption for each and every hour of driving.
plaintiffs further claim that this is unacceptable, especially in light of the fact that they purchased these cars with the intention of owning an automobile that would provide them with ample driving time.
Complaint plaintiffs further claim that the manufacturer has known for many years that its new engine requires far more oil consumption than previously sold cars, yet it continues to add unnecessary parts to its lineup in order to meet the legal regulations.
In addition, the manufacturer has known for many years that its camshaft and cylinder rings are defective and likely to cause excessive oil consumption or burn-outs, yet it continues to add these parts to its lineup. The plaintiffs are asking that the court allow them to seek damages due to the manufacturing defects and the resulting excessive oil consumption as a direct result of these defects.